Interbent

Interbent
Your Ad Here
So much is being said about the recent Swine Flu outbreak and it’s potential dangers. While the world is panicking and running for cover, some are taking a second look at Swine Flu. We will explore the history of flu pandemics the perceived dangers of Swine Flu are greatly changed.

 

Resources

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Influenza_pandemic

http://www3.niaid.nih.gov/topics/Flu/Research/Pandemic/TimelineHumanPandemics.htm

Popularity: 2% [?]

Your Ad Here

Reader Comment

Normand Robert (May 3rd, 2009, 03:31 pm)

According to various sources, the Spanish flu did not come from Spain. An early spike in cases was in America and the disease may have come from Asia. Reporting in the press was more frequent than in other countries because Spain at the time was not at war and not subject to censorship rules.

From CDC "http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/eid/vol12no01/05-0979.htm
"Historical and epidemiologic data are inadequate to identify the geographic origin of the virus (21), and recent phylogenetic analysis of the 1918 viral genome does not place the virus in any geographic context (19).

Grant Smith (May 3rd, 2009, 05:20 pm)

Thank you for this great visual information graphic!

Dwight (May 3rd, 2009, 09:37 pm)

"Spanish flu" did NOT come from Spain.

Try better next time.

Joe (May 4th, 2009, 06:55 pm)

swine flu killed 1 million?
wha?

Jim (May 4th, 2009, 09:24 pm)

As of this morning, the CDC is reporting a total of 25 confirmed deaths in Mexico and 1 confirmed death in the United States due to swine flu. This graph indicates 1 million?

Wow. The creator of this graph must be an affiliate of FOX News.

Sanguinity (May 4th, 2009, 09:56 pm)

What a useless chart. Even after accounting for the typo, it doesn't make any sense to compare the first few weeks of this pandemic to the final totals from past pandemics. If you're going to make a comparison, then compare the first few weeks of this one to the first few weeks of the others.

Reality (May 4th, 2009, 11:59 pm)

This chart is shoddy and highly inaccurate

kms (May 8th, 2009, 12:35 pm)

From your own cited source (CDC: Influenza Pandemics of the 20th century):
Three WORLDWIDE (PANDEMIC) outbreaks of influenza occurred in the 20th century: in 1918, 1957, and 1968. The latter 2 were in the era of modern virology and most thoroughly characterized. All 3 have been informally identified by their presumed sites of origin as Spanish, Asian, and Hong Kong influenza, respectively. They are now known to represent 3 different antigenic subtypes of influenza A virus: H1N1, H2N2, and H3N2, respectively. NOT classified as true pandemics are 3 NOTABLE EPIDEMICS: a pseudopandemic in 1947 with low death rates, an epidemic in 1977 that was a pandemic in children, and an abortive epidemic of swine influenza in 1976 that was feared to have pandemic potential. Major influenza epidemics show no predictable periodicity or pattern, and all differ from one another. Evidence suggests that true pandemics with changes in hemagglutinin subtypes arise from genetic reassortment with animal influenza A viruses.

kms (May 8th, 2009, 12:35 pm)

Definition of pandemic: occurring over a WIDE GEOGRAPHIC AREA and affecting an EXCEPTIONALLY HIGH PROPORTION OF THE POPULATION (from Merriam-Webster's Medical Dictionary)

1) The above poster is correct that "Spanish" influenza is likely to actually have arisen in the USA (or possibly China) and travelled with military personel to Spain, where it was first widely reported.

2) As well as the mistakes mentioned above, the only PANDEMICS were in 1889, 1918, 1957 and 1968 (and now in 2009). The remainder of these events were local EPIDEMICS. Calculating a mortality rate by using "x deaths" per the WORLD population for these events yields a misleading and inaccurate number. These should all be removed from the map entirely.

Please remember to take all internet resources with a grain of salt, unless from a reputable source (directly from CDC, etc.)

steven (May 9th, 2009, 03:06 am)

The bird flu and the swine flu are just media hype. How do you even compare 200 deaths to 50 million on the same article?

campaign intelligence (May 11th, 2009, 04:06 am)

Why do I see red rash or is it chicken pox

Paul Songer (May 11th, 2009, 02:23 pm)

Brilliant. This really does put the nonsense into perspective. I will show this to my very frightened 8 year old. the media should be more responsible.

meta search engine (May 11th, 2009, 05:47 pm)

Wow, this really makes the Swine Flu look like nothing. Thanks media for blowing this wayyy out of proportion.

linkz me (May 14th, 2009, 03:55 pm)

And notice that it killed the EXACT same number of people as the bird flu scare of 1997. Coincidence? You be the judge!

r bobby (May 15th, 2009, 11:55 am)

Wow, this really makes the Swine Flu look like nothing. Thanks media for blowing this wayyy out of proportion.

yachting (May 15th, 2009, 01:31 pm)

the pandemic is often attributed to the piles of rotting corpses hanging around all over Europe at the time

avi (May 17th, 2009, 04:12 pm)

I don't think this chart and information is accurate. But, Inspite of that it gives me good information about Swine Flu (As I am not aware about it, first read here).

zane (May 21st, 2009, 01:38 pm)

I keep wondering where that 36,000 a year statistic comes from

Hai (September 11th, 2009, 01:53 pm)

36K death stats based on 1990-1999 data, study here:
http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/full/289/2/179

Leave a Comment